Three Years or Forever? The Two Japan Strategies for Indians — and the Exact Month the Math Flips

Most Indians who move to Japan never actually choose a strategy. They arrive on a three-year visa, renew it, renew it again, and one evening in year seven they open a calculator and realise nobody ever told them that Japan's pension system has two hard edges — and that they have been standing between them for two years.

This article is about those two edges. One sits at month 60. The other sits at month 120. Where you are relative to them changes the value of your years in Japan by lakhs of rupees, and almost nothing you read online explains why.

By the end you'll know which of the two strategies you're actually on, what each one is worth in rupees using Japan's own published tables, and — the part we think matters most — why the arithmetic alone should probably not be the thing that decides it for you.

Key takeaway: Japan's pension refund is calculated on a maximum of 60 months, but claiming it wipes out every month you ever contributed. So months 61 to 119 are a dead zone: they add nothing to your exit payout while quietly enlarging what you throw away. At 120 months you cross a line — you can no longer claim the refund at all, and may instead be entitled to a Japanese pension for life. Decide before you drift into the dead zone, not after. And if you have prior EPS service in India, the Japan–India social security agreement may put you over 120 months sooner than you think.

---

The two strategies, named

Almost every Indian working in Japan is on one of these, whether or not they've admitted it.

Strategy A — The Sprint. Three to five years. Earn in yen, live modestly, remit hard, come home with capital and a Japan line on your CV. You treat Japan as a high-yield posting, not a country you'll grow old in. At the exit you claim the lump-sum withdrawal payment (脱退一時金, dattai ichijikin) — the pension refund — and close the file.

Strategy B — The Stay. Ten years or more. Permanent residency, a housing loan, kids in a Japanese school, and a Japanese pension that pays for the rest of your life. You stop treating your salary as remittance fuel and start treating it as a household balance sheet.

Both are legitimate. Plenty of people do the Sprint well and go home better off than many domestic paths would have made them. What almost nobody does well is the thing in between — and the in-between is where most people actually end up.

Here's why that middle is so expensive.

---

Edge one: month 60, where the refund stops growing

When you leave Japan for good, you can claim back part of what you paid into the pension system. The rules are published by the Japan Pension Service (JPS) in a multilingual claim booklet, and they are unusually specific.

For Employees' Pension Insurance (厚生年金, the one you're in if you're a salaried employee), the formula is:

Lump-sum = average standard remuneration × payment rate

where the payment rate rises in six-month steps and stops at 60 months (Japan Pension Service, Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment booklet, March 2026 edition):

Two things follow immediately, and both are worth money.

First: the six-month step is a real cliff. Each band is worth roughly half a month's average remuneration. Leaving in month 59 instead of month 60 costs you the jump from 4.9 to 5.5 — about 0.6 × your average standard remuneration. For someone whose average standard remuneration is ¥311,200, that single month is worth ≈¥186,720 ≈ ₹1.12 lakh. Before you book the flight, check which side of a six-month boundary your last insured month falls on.

Second: at 60 months the number stops moving. Month 61 pays the same as month 60. So does month 90. So does month 119.

For the National Pension (国民年金, for the self-employed, students and others not on an employer's scheme), the amounts are flat-rate and published outright. If your last contribution month falls between April 2026 and March 2027, the 60-month maximum is ¥537,600 ≈ ₹3.2 lakh, stepping up in the same six-month bands from ¥53,760 at six months.

Our full pension refund guide walks through the claim paperwork itself. This article is about whether you should file it at all.

---

The sentence in the booklet that nobody quotes

Buried on page four of the same JPS booklet, in bold-adjacent officialese, is the sentence that decides this entire question:

"Under any circumstances, the recipient of the Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment will forfeit all periods of Japanese pension coverage before claiming the Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment."

JPS then works the example itself, so there's no room to argue about interpretation:

"if a person who has been enrolled in a Japanese pension for 90 months claims the Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment, he will receive the upper limit of the Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment, which is payment for 60 months. However, all 90 months of the enrollment period will be considered invalid."

Read that twice. You are paid for 60 months. You surrender 90. The other 30 months of contributions — roughly two and a half years of 9.15% of your salary, matched by your employer (the Employees' Pension rate is fixed at 18.3%, split evenly) — buy you exactly nothing.

That gap is what we call the dead zone.

The dead zone, in rupees

Take a mid-career Indian software engineer on an Engineer/Specialist in Humanities/International Services status. We'll use ¥311,200/month as her average standard remuneration — the working average for that residence status we've used across our salary analyses. Treat it as an illustration, not a benchmark: average standard remuneration also folds in bonuses, so a salaried worker's real figure is usually higher. Use your own number from nenkin teiki-bin or the salary calculator below for an answer that applies to you.

Computed by Komichi, using the JPS payment-rate table and ¥1 ≈ ₹0.60:

From month 61 to month 119 the payout column is frozen. The forfeiture column is not. Fifty-nine months of contributions, in the worst case, purchase zero additional rupees.

That is one of the most expensive things an Indian in Japan can do without noticing, and it is largely avoidable. For most people the cleaner options are to finish the Sprint by month 60, or to commit to the Stay and get past 120.

(One tax note while you're here: the Employees' Pension lump-sum has 20.42% withheld at source for non-residents. Much of it is typically refundable, but in practice this usually requires appointing a tax agent (納税管理人) at your local tax office before you leave Japan. Miss that step and the refund becomes a genuine headache from Bengaluru. The National Pension lump-sum has no withholding.)

---

Edge two: month 120, where the refund disappears and a pension appears

Japan's old-age pension requires a qualifying period of 120 months — ten years. Hit it, and you're entitled to a Japanese pension for life, payable wherever you live.

And here's the part people find genuinely surprising: once you're over 120 months, you may no longer claim the lump-sum at all. The JPS booklet is explicit — "If you have 120 months (10 years) or more of the 'eligibility period' to receive a pension at the time of your claim, you cannot claim the Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment." The choice is removed from you. The claim form itself makes you sign a declaration that your total enrolment is under 120 months.

So month 120 is not a gradual slope. It is a switch.

What the pension is actually worth

Two components stack. Using the same ¥311,200 average standard remuneration, the FY2026 (Reiwa 8) full Old-age Basic Pension of ¥847,300/year (Japan Pension Service, benefit amounts from April 2026), and the standard earnings-related multiplier of 5.481/1000 per month of service for periods after April 2003 (JPS, Old-age Employees' Pension):

Computed by Komichi. Rounded; your actual entitlement depends on your full record.

At exactly 120 months, the pension is worth about ¥416,500 a year — ₹2.5 lakh — for life, from age 65.

Compare that to the ¥1,711,600 you gave up by not claiming the refund. The pension repays it in 4.1 years of payments. Live to 85 and you've collected roughly ¥8.3 million ≈ ₹50 lakh against a forgone ₹10.3 lakh.

But hold on. That comparison is doing something dishonest, and we're not going to pretend otherwise.

---

The honest version: the two strategies are closer than either camp admits

The ₹50-lakh-versus-₹10-lakh framing ignores that the ₹10 lakh arrives now and the ₹50 lakh arrives in dribs and drabs starting decades from now. Money you receive at 65 is not the same money as cash in your hand at 32.

So let's do it properly. Imagine you hit month 120 at age 32, and you'd collect from 65 to 85. Here's what that pension stream is worth in today's money at different real discount rates — that is, at different assumptions about what else you could do with the cash:

Computed by Komichi. Assumptions: ¥416,500/year in real terms, 20 annual payments from age 65, discounted back 33 years. Ignores indexation beyond inflation, survivor benefits, disability cover, tax, and currency movement. Illustrative only.

Which means: if you're young, and you'd genuinely deploy the refund into something that compounds at a solid real rate in India, the Sprint is not the financially foolish choice people online say it is. If you'd spend it, or if you're older when you hit month 120, the Stay typically looks stronger.

This is the reframe we'd like you to take away. The pension line item does not decide between Strategy A and Strategy B. It's close enough to be a tiebreaker, not a verdict.

What does decide it is bigger and less numerical: whether your earnings keep rising in Japan or plateau, whether your spouse can work, whether your kids' schooling works out, whether you want to be 55 in Nagoya or in Nagpur. We wrote honestly about the case against Japan in "who should not move to Japan" (article coming soon), and about what the currency does to all of this in is the weak yen still worth it.

The pension math's real job is narrower, and it's this: don't let the decision get made for you by drift. Many people find it useful to decide by around month 55 — so they're not standing in the dead zone at month 90 wondering what happened.

---

The India-only twist: your EPS months may already have decided this

Here is the part that applies to Indians and almost nobody else, and that we have not seen explained anywhere in the India–Japan space.

Japan and India have a social security agreement in force since 1 October 2016. India is one of only twenty countries on Japan's pension-totalisation list — Japan has more agreements than that, but several of them cover only the avoidance of double contributions, not totalisation (Japan Pension Service, partner countries and their scope; the twenty-country list is reproduced in the claim booklet as of March 2026). Totalisation means your Indian and Japanese coverage periods can be added together to test whether you qualify for a pension in either country.

JPS spells out both directions on its India page (Notes on Individual Rules under the Japan–India Social Security Agreement):

• Toward a Japanese pension: "If you do not have enough coverage periods under Japanese pension systems… you can totalize your EPS coverage period to meet the qualification requirement."
• Toward an Indian EPS pension: the EPS old-age pension needs 10 years of EPS coverage; if you're short, "you can totalize your Japanese coverage period… in order to meet the qualification requirement."

Now put that next to the lump-sum rule. The JPS claim form makes you declare that your total enrolment is under 120 months "including the period during which I was enrolled in the pension system of a country that has a pension totalization agreement with Japan."

On our reading, that means your Indian EPS months count against the 120-month bar that blocks the refund.

Computed by Komichi, from the JPS declaration text. Confirm your own position with the Japan Pension Service before planning around it.

If that's right, a very ordinary Indian career — six years at an Indian employer with EPS deductions, then four years in Japan — may leave you unable to claim the pension refund you were counting on, and instead holding a Japanese pension entitlement plus a preserved Indian one. That isn't a loss. But it is not what your exit spreadsheet says.

Two important caveats, and please don't skip them.

1. EPF is not EPS. JPS states plainly that the Employees' Provident Fund "is not subject to the provisions related to totalization" because it pays a retirement lump sum. Only EPS — the pension scheme — totalises. Check which you were actually in.
2. Not every Indian employee is an EPS member. Enrolment rules have changed over time — notably around the wage-ceiling revision of 1 September 2014 — and some higher-paid private-sector employees are outside EPS entirely. Your EPFO passbook is the only reliable answer; pull it before you assume.

And the mirror-image warning: if you do claim the Japan lump-sum, your Japanese months are void — which, on our reading, also removes them from any future totalisation toward your Indian EPS eligibility. If your Indian record is sitting just short of 10 years, that Japanese block of months may be more valuable where it is. Worth an hour with EPFO and JPS before you sign anything.

---

The under-used move: claim in instalments, not once

If your Japan story has more than one chapter — a training route, a trip home, then a return — JPS actually tells you how to avoid the 60-month cap entirely. The booklet's own example:

"if you've returned to your country after finishing three years (36 months) of technical intern training… and then came to Japan as a Specified Skilled Worker No. 1 (period of stay up to 5 years). If you claim the Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment after finishing your technical intern training… and after the end of your stay as the Specified Skilled Worker No. 1 as well, you can receive the Lump-sum Withdrawal Payment in accordance with each enrollment period."

Two claims, each capped at 60 months, instead of one claim capped at 60 months across the whole thing. For anyone on the training-to-skilled-worker ladder — which from April 2027 becomes the Ikusei Shuro route feeding into Specified Skilled Worker — that is a materially different number.

Three conditions make it work, and all three are easy to fumble:

• You must file a moving-out notification (転出届) at your city hall and genuinely leave. If you keep a re-entry permit and skip the moving-out notification, you remain an insured person and cannot claim.
• You must claim within two years of ceasing to have an address in Japan.
• You must claim after each stay, not once at the end of everything.

⚠️ A change is coming here, and its date is not fixed. Japan's 2025 pension reform act (promulgated 20 June 2025) adds a rule that you cannot claim the lump-sum while you hold a re-entry permit. The act's supplementary provisions set the start date by Cabinet order "within four years of promulgation" — so any time up to June 2029 — and as of the most recent specialist analysis we could find (July 2026), no such order had been published. Plan for it arriving; don't plan around a specific date, and check the position before you book anything.

---

Myth-bust: "the cap becomes eight years in April 2026"

You will see this stated as settled fact, including in AI-generated summaries. It isn't, and the reason is worth understanding because it will save you from a badly timed flight.

The 2025 reform act does raise the calculation cap from 60 months to 96 months (eight years) — a change driven by the fact that the new training-to-skilled-worker pathway keeps people in Japan longer. The legislation is real. The commencement is the problem.

Here's the actual test, and it's a statutory one. Much of the reform act did commence on 1 April 2026. But these particular provisions carry their own commencement clause: "a date fixed by Cabinet order within four years of promulgation." A provision like that is not in force until the Cabinet order is issued and gazetted. A Japanese immigration specialist traced the statute in July 2026 and found no such order — concluding that the "April 2026" claim conflates the reform act's general commencement with these specific provisions (行政書士事務所きりん, July 2026). Corroborating this, JPS's own claim booklet as of its March 2026 edition still prints the 60-month payment-rate table reproduced above.

So: treat 60 months as the operative cap unless you can point at a Cabinet order that says otherwise, and be sceptical of anyone who quotes you a start date without one. If and when 96 months does arrive, the dead zone shrinks from months 61–119 to months 97–119 — it does not disappear.

---

What changed in 2026 — and why the Stay just got harder to enter

If you're leaning toward Strategy B, the ground is moving under you right now, and the direction is one way.

Japan's current PR rules (Immigration Services Agency, guideline revised 24 February 2026) require, in outline: ten years' continuous residence, of which five years on a work or residence status (excluding Technical Intern Training and Specified Skilled Worker No. 1); good conduct; independent livelihood; and proper payment of taxes, pension and health-insurance premiums. The PR-side fast tracks are unchanged in the draft — three years at 70 Highly Skilled Professional points, one year at 80 points, one year for Special Highly Skilled. (Note the distinction that matters later: the PR guideline isn't changing those thresholds, but a separate Highly Skilled Professional ordinance may change what earns you the points in the first place.) Our HSP guide and the points calculator cover how the score is built.

On 4 August 2026 the ISA published a draft replacement for that guideline and opened it for public comment, closing at 00:00 on 4 September 2026 — in practice, the end of 3 September (case number 315000140). It runs to thirteen pages against the current one-page document. Everything below is a draft under consultation — do not treat it as settled law.

Timeline as drafted and as reported. Sourced to the ISA draft text; the 1 October revision date is not in the draft, which leaves the date blank — it comes from reporting by several Japanese national outlets (Asahi, Yomiuri, Kyodo and Tokyo Shimbun), as compiled by Japanese immigration practitioners.

Three items in there deserve an Indian reader's full attention.

1. The draft turns your pension record into an immigration requirement. The proposed benchmark asks whether your projected pension reaches the level of someone who worked 30 years enrolled in Employees' Pension at above-average household income, with a shortfall makeable up from financial assets on an age-scaled basis. This is the whole article closing into a loop: the same contribution record that the Sprint destroys is the record the Stay may soon be graded on. If you're on Strategy B, gaps and unpaid months in your record are no longer just a retirement problem.

2. Intra-company transfer may stop counting toward the five years. The draft redefines "work status" to exclude, among others, the Intra-company Transferee status. A large share of Indians arrive in Japan precisely this way — deputed by an Indian IT services employer. If adopted as drafted, and read the way at least some practitioners are reading it, ten years in Japan entirely on that status might not satisfy the five-year sub-requirement. If that's you, a conversation about changing status to Engineer/Specialist in Humanities/International Services before April 2027 is worth having with a licensed immigration lawyer or a registered gyōseishoshi.

3. Long trips home are being counted. The draft would treat as a negative "a single absence of six months or more, or absences totalling two years and six months or more" within the previous ten years, without reasonable cause. Extended stays in India for family reasons are common and understandable — but under the draft they carry a cost, so document the reason.

Separately, the PR application fee rises from ¥10,000 to ¥200,000 (≈₹1.2 lakh) for applications from 1 October 2026 (Cabinet adopted 25 Aug 2026) — see full fee table, alongside increases to extension and change-of-status fees. This is also still a draft. And the Nikkei has reported that the ministry is preparing to tighten the Highly Skilled Professional criteria, raising the income thresholds and pruning some scoring items, via a ministerial ordinance revision expected within FY2026 — which would narrow the very fast track that makes the Stay reachable in three years rather than ten. That is a separate instrument from the PR guideline above, and also not yet published in draft.

None of this makes the Stay a bad strategy. It does make it a strategy you should start executing earlier and more deliberately than people did five years ago. Our permanent residency guide tracks the requirements as they're confirmed.

---

A five-question decision framework

Not a quiz with a score. Five questions where an honest answer usually settles it.

1. Where are you on the month counter, right now? Count your insured months, not your calendar years. Under 54: you still have a clean Sprint exit ahead of you. 54 to 60: you're at the last six-month band — check the date carefully before you book anything. 61 to 119: you are in the dead zone, paying for a pension you're planning to destroy. 120 or more: the refund is off the table, so the question has already answered itself.

2. Do you have EPS months in India? Pull the EPFO passbook. If prior EPS service plus Japan service is near 120, the refund may be off the table and your planning changes completely.

3. What's the realistic trajectory of your Japanese salary? Strategy B only compounds if your income does. If your Japanese is stuck and your role is capped, the Stay's financial case weakens quickly — see what Japan's labour shortage actually opens up for where the trajectory exists, and our Japanese-level-by-visa map for what the language bar looks like at each rung. If you're building toward the draft PR guideline's B1 requirement, the JLPT in India guide is where to start.

4. Can your household actually run here? Spouse's work rights, childcare, schooling, and the honest arithmetic of two incomes versus one. Start with the dependent-visa and family guide. If the household doesn't work, the pension math is irrelevant.

5. What would the refund actually do? Be specific. "It becomes the down payment on a flat in Pune" and "it sits in a savings account" are different answers that point to different strategies. The discount-rate table above only favours the Sprint if the money genuinely goes to work.

If you want the numbers for your own case rather than our illustrative engineer's, the salary calculator and tax calculator will give you your real take-home and deductions, and Nenkin Net will give you your real contribution record.

---

What to do this week

Whichever strategy you're on, three things are worth doing in the next seven days.

1. Get your actual month count. Log into Nenkin Net or read your nenkin teiki-bin. Everything in this article turns on a number most people have never looked up.
2. Check your EPFO passbook for EPS months. Ten minutes on the EPFO portal.
3. Write the date of your month 60 in your calendar. Not because you must leave then — because after that date, every further month is a decision, and decisions you don't make get made by drift.

Then read the two guides that sit either side of this one: the pension refund guide if you're leaning Sprint, and the permanent residency guide if you're leaning Stay. Both were built for exactly this fork.

---

FAQ

How much is the Japan pension refund for Indians? For Employees' Pension, it's your average standard remuneration multiplied by a payment rate that maxes out at 5.5 at 60 months. On an average standard remuneration of ¥311,200 that's about ¥1.71 million ≈ ₹10.3 lakh gross, with 20.42% withheld at source and largely refundable if you appoint a tax agent before leaving. For National Pension, the FY2026 maximum is ¥537,600 ≈ ₹3.2 lakh. Your own figure depends on your actual salary history — check nenkin net.

Can I claim the pension refund and still get permanent residency later? The refund is only claimable once you've left Japan and no longer have an address here, so the two don't overlap in time. But if you return later, the forfeited months are gone permanently — they won't count toward the 120-month pension qualification, and under the ISA's draft guideline your pension projection may itself become a PR consideration from April 2027. Claiming the refund and later pursuing PR may still be possible, but it restarts your pension record from zero — which matters more under the draft guideline than it did before.

Is it true the pension refund cap becomes eight years in 2026? The 96-month cap is legislated but, on the evidence we can find, not yet in force. The commencement date is set by Cabinet order within four years of the law's promulgation on 20 June 2025, and the most recent specialist analysis we located (July 2026) found no such order published; JPS's March 2026 claim booklet still uses a 60-month maximum throughout. Treat 60 months as current and verify the position before planning around a change.

Do my Indian EPF years count toward the Japanese pension? EPS years may; EPF years do not. JPS states that the Employees' Provident Fund is excluded from totalisation because it pays a lump sum at retirement, while the Employees' Pension Scheme can be totalised with Japanese periods to meet a minimum-coverage requirement in either country. Confirm your own EPS status with EPFO — not every Indian employee is an EPS member.

What happens to my Japanese pension if I retire in India? If you qualify (120 months, totalised where applicable), Japan pays the pension to you abroad. On the tax side, note this comes from a different instrument: under the India–Japan income tax convention, Japanese pension benefits received in India are typically taxable in India and may be exempt from Japanese income tax, provided you file the Application Form for Income Tax Convention (Form 9) with JPS. Confirm your own position with a tax professional in both countries.

Is ten years in Japan worth it for an Indian just for the pension? On the pension alone, honestly — no, not decisively. Our discount-rate table shows the two strategies land within touching distance of each other for a young worker. Ten years is worth it if your career, family and life work here. The pension is a reason not to leave badly, not a reason to stay.

Which is better overall, the Gulf or Japan? Different shapes entirely — often employer-provided housing and no income tax on one side, a higher wage ladder and a refundable pension on the other. Both are good options for the right person. We ran the five-year simulation for the same worker on both routes in Japan vs the Gulf.

---

This article is general information, not legal, immigration, tax, financial, or medical advice. Rules, fees, and figures change and vary by individual circumstances — the ISA guideline discussed here is a draft under public comment and may change before adoption. Verify the latest details with official sources (e.g. the Japan Pension Service, the Immigration Services Agency of Japan, EPFO, and the relevant embassy) and consult a qualified professional before making decisions.

Related reading: the ₹35 lakh illusion on what a Japanese salary really nets · salaries, tax and savings in Japan for the deduction walkthrough · sending money home · NISA for Indians in Japan if you're building the Stay's balance sheet · furusato nozei · cost of living in Japan versus India · how much money you need to move · Indians in Japan: every statistic that matters · Japanese work culture for Indians.